• Patients should stop taking Coumadin 5 days prior to any such procedure.
For all such patients on Coumadin, coagulation studies should then be ordered on the day of procedure, including a PT/INR.
• Low molecular weight heparin should not be administered less than 24 hours prior to the procedure.
• For core biopsies only, patients should also stop the following 5 days prior: aspirin, non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID’s), Plavix, garlic pills, and gingko supplements.
Thyroid fine needle aspirations and all non-biopsy procedures are exempt from this last condition.
Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Public health advisory. Update on MRI contrast agents containing gadolinium and nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy. Available at: www.fda.gov/cder/drug/advisory/gadolinium_agents_20061222.htm.
Sadowski et al. Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis: Risk Factors and Incidence Estimation. Radiology 2007; 243: 149-157.
What is the recommended imaging study for evaluation of pulmonary embolus in pregnant patients?
Computed tomography makes use of ionizing radiation, which should be avoided when possible,
especially in pregnant patients, and especially in the first trimester of pregnancy.
However, when absolutely necessary, pulmonary CTA (CT angiography) is the preferred method of
radiologic evaluation for pulmonary embolus in pregnant patients, provided that no contra-indications
to iodinated contrast are present. It is unlikely that a single CT examination will lead to serious
adverse outcomes to the fetus. The use of iodinated contrast in pregnant patients has not been shown to
be associated with adverse outcomes.
References:
1. McColl MD, Ramsay JE, Tait RC, et al. Risk factors for pregnancy associated venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost 1997;78:1183-8.
2. Gherman RB, Goodwin TM, Leung B, et al. Incidence, clinical characteristics, and timing of objectively diagnosed venous
thromboembolism during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:730-4.
3. Ros HS, Lichtenstein P, Bellocco R, et al. Pulmonary embolism and stroke in relation to pregnancy: how can high-risk women be
identified? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:198-203.
4. British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee Pulmonary Embolism Guideline Development Group. British Thoracic Society
guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Thorax 2003; 58: 470-483.
5. Hayashino Y, Goto M, Noguchi Y, Fukui T. Ventilation-perfusion scanning and helical CT in suspected pulmonary embolism:
meta-analysis of diagnostic performance. Radiology 2005; 234: 740-748.
6. Quiroz R, Kucher N, Zou KH, Kipfmueller F, Costello P, Goldhaber SZ, Schoepf UJ. Clinical validity of a negative computed
tomography scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. JAMA 2005; 293: 2012-7.
7. Chan WS, Ray JG, Murray S, Coady GE, Coates, G, Ginsberg, JS. Suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy:
Clinical presentation, results of lung scanning, and subsequent maternal and pediatric outcomes. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162: 1170-1175.
8. Winer-Muram HT, Boone JM, Brown HL, Jennings SG, Mabie WC, Lombardo GT. Pulmonary embolism in pregnant patients:
fetal radiation dose with helical CT. Radiology. 2002; 224: 487-92.
9. Russell JR, Stabin MG, Sparks RB, et al. Radiation absorbed dose to the embryo/fetus from radiopharmaceuticals.
Health Phys 1997; 73:756-769.
10. Hammer-Jacobsen E. Therapeutic abortion on account of x-ray examination during pregnancy. Danish Med Bull 1959; 6: 113-122.
11. Hall EJ. Radiobiology for the radiologist, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1994: 363-452.
12. Wagner LK, Archer BR, Zeck OF. Conceptus dose from two state-of-the-art CT scanners. Radiology 1986; 159: 787-792.
13. Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM, Boone JM. The essential physics of medical imaging. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1994; 694.
14. Nelson JA, Livingston JC, Moon RG. Mutagenic evaluation of radiographic contrast media. Invest Radiol 1982; 17: 183-185.
15. Morisetti A, Tirone P, Luzzani F, de Haen C. Toxicologic safety assessment of iomeprol, a new x-ray contrast agent.
Eur J Radiol 1994; 18 (Suppl 1): 21-31.
16. Ralston WH, Robbins MS, James P. Reproductive, developmental, and genetic toxicity of ioversol. Invest Radiol 1989; 24 (Suppl 1): 16-22.
17. desch F, Camus M, Ermans AM, et al. Adverse effects of amniofetography on fetal thyroid function. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976; 126: 723-726.
18. na G, Zaffaroni M, Defilippi C, et al. Effects of iopamidol on neonatal thyroid function. Eur J Radiol 1992; 12: 22-25.
19. Webb JA, Thomsen HS, Morcos SK; Members of Contrast Media Safety Committee of European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR).
The use of iodinated and gadolinium contrast media during pregnancy and lactation. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 1234-1240.
Which types of intravenous acess are suitable for the administration of
contrast materials?
For most contrast-enhanced CT and MR exams, a 22-gauge or larger IV is
preferable, but a 24 gauge IV may be adequate for hand injections. For CT
angiography exams (e.g. rule out PE, peripheral runoffs), as well as
multiphase CT exams (e.g. liver and pancreas protocol exams), an 18-gauge IV
is preferred given the higher injection rates of contrast.
Tunneled catheters and PICC's are in general not approved for power
injector use. However, Power Port's and Power PICC's manufactured by Bard
are approved for use with power injectors. If you are interested in these
products, you should consult with the surgeon or intravenous therapy team at
your institution regarding their availability.